In Autumn, all eyes are on the North Pacific

With Autumn officially underway and the leaves starting to turn, many are beginning to wonder about the upcoming winter, and if the Autumn pattern will foreshadow it. Unfortunately, it is not as easy as “cold October yields cold winter” or “warm October yields warm Winter”. If that were the case, we’d have long range forecasting figured out by now, and there would be no need for winter outlooks. The best we have for now are correlations, analogs, physical pattern drivers, and pattern persistence. When added together, the summation of these various factors provide a higher probability of success in medium to long range forecasting, but these methods are far from perfect. The evolution of different atmospheric oscillations during the autumn season can give us a substantial clue as to the ensuing winter’s dominant index modalities.

In this particular case, let’s examine the autumn north pacific pattern of years since 1990, giving us a sample size of 22+ years. The North Pacific pattern is often represented as the East Pacific Oscillation (EPO). Like the North Atlantic Oscillation the EPO has certain, generally predictable outcomes when it oscillates from positive to negative phases. The positive phase of the EPO is usually associated with lower than normal heights across the northeastern Pacific, much of Alaska, and northwestern Canada. Conversely, the negative phase of the EPO generally produces higher than normal heights over the region just described. The positive (+EPO) tends to flood the United States with maritime pacific air due to the low pressure around Alaska, while the negative (-EPO) acts as a block to maritime pacific air due to high pressure over the NE Pacific/Alaska. The -EPO often sets up a cross polar flow with high pressure centered over Alaska and the flow oriented across the north pole from Siberia into Canada. The -EPO pattern has yielded some of most impressive, severe arctic outbreaks on record.

So let’s look at all the Octobers since 1990 that preceded our colder than normal / snowier than normal winters:




If you notice, the October patterns prior to those cold/snowy winters generally had higher than average heights around Alaska and the Northeast Pacific.

Let’s fast forward into November. Below are the Novembers preceding those same winters:


The overall negative EPO / higher than normal height pattern in the NE PAC and Alaska persisted through November, and then as we know from having experienced those winters, through the Dec-Jan-Feb period. This is indicative of the tendency for EPO patterns to repeat and persist in a dominant fashion from mid/late autumn through the ensuing winter season.

Now let’s turn the tables and examine all of our warmer than normal / not snowy winters since 1990. The Octobers that preceded those winters looked like this at 500mb:


Notice the tendency for lower than normal heights in the NE Pacific and around Alaska. Low pressure dominated the region.

Here’s the Novembers prior to our warmer/less snowy winters, the resultant pattern is +EPO for November:



The conclusion from this is that the autumn, Oct-Nov, EPO / North Pacific pattern is often a clue to the ensuing winter’s north pacific / EPO pattern. Our warmer, less snowy winters have usually been preceded by autumns with a positive EPO predominate signal, while our colder, snowy winters usually followed autumns of negative EPO patterns.

The takeaway message here is to hope for continued blocking near Alaska as we approach Thanksgiving, if you’re a cold/snow lover. If you’re hoping for a warm winter, you should be hoping for a reversal of that (which does often happen) to a November positive EPO regime. Time will tell how the next several weeks evolve.

Data and information compiled by Tom Stavola.